-
Mashup Score: 1Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey - 6 month(s) ago
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in virtual (ie, telephone, video) care in many countries, particularly in the primary care setting.1 Yet, the impact of this increase on actual clinical practice remains unclear. Experts have hypothesised that the growth in virtual care could lead to more1 or less2 low-value care. Similarly, recent studies in single healthcare systems suggest that timeliness of care delivered virtually may be better3 or no different4 than in-person care. As this increased use of virtual care is enduring, it is critical to understand the positive and negative practice implications of virtual care. Here, we report the results of a representative, multinational survey of primary care physician perspectives on how virtual care changed their clinical practices. The Commonwealth Fund’s 2022 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians reflects the experiences and perceptions of a nationally representative randomised sample of primary care phys
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 1Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey - 6 month(s) ago
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in virtual (ie, telephone, video) care in many countries, particularly in the primary care setting.1 Yet, the impact of this increase on actual clinical practice remains unclear. Experts have hypothesised that the growth in virtual care could lead to more1 or less2 low-value care. Similarly, recent studies in single healthcare systems suggest that timeliness of care delivered virtually may be better3 or no different4 than in-person care. As this increased use of virtual care is enduring, it is critical to understand the positive and negative practice implications of virtual care. Here, we report the results of a representative, multinational survey of primary care physician perspectives on how virtual care changed their clinical practices. The Commonwealth Fund’s 2022 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians reflects the experiences and perceptions of a nationally representative randomised sample of primary care phys
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet-
Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey #ResearchLetter by @rkmetcalfe and colleagues Link: https://t.co/MoRPr5jaUB https://t.co/2Vy4GwQgdM
-
-
Mashup Score: 1Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey - 6 month(s) ago
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in virtual (ie, telephone, video) care in many countries, particularly in the primary care setting.1 Yet, the impact of this increase on actual clinical practice remains unclear. Experts have hypothesised that the growth in virtual care could lead to more1 or less2 low-value care. Similarly, recent studies in single healthcare systems suggest that timeliness of care delivered virtually may be better3 or no different4 than in-person care. As this increased use of virtual care is enduring, it is critical to understand the positive and negative practice implications of virtual care. Here, we report the results of a representative, multinational survey of primary care physician perspectives on how virtual care changed their clinical practices. The Commonwealth Fund’s 2022 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians reflects the experiences and perceptions of a nationally representative randomised sample of primary care phys
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet-
Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey #ResearchLetter by @rkmetcalfe and colleagues Link: https://t.co/MoRPr5jaUB https://t.co/2Vy4GwQgdM
-
-
Mashup Score: 4
Correspondence to: Qi Huang, PhD, Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, London, WC1H 0BT. Email Population, Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (D.R.), University College London. Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London (V.T., K.L,B,). Paediatric Cardiology, Evelina London Children’s Hospital (H.B.-R.). Paediatric Cardiology, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London (R.C.G.F.). Great Ormond Street
Source: www.ahajournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiology News and JournTweet-
#ResearchLetter: In this retrospective cohort study of children born in England and Wales, most survivors with functionally single ventricle physiology required additional surgical or interventional procedures. https://t.co/9a8yIhZSHG
-
-
Mashup Score: 13Potential of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Selecting Target Vessels for Radial Artery Grafting: A Retrospective Observational Study - 6 month(s) ago
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Z. Hu, C.W., X.Y., S.Z., Y.Z., W.F.), Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Z. Hu, C.W., X.Y., S.Z., Y.Z., W.F.), Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Z. Hu, C.W., X.Y., S.Z., Y.Z., W.F.),
Source: www.ahajournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiology News and JournTweet-
#ResearchLetter: An invasive angiography-based coronary assessment with high diagnostic accuracy in identifying coronary lesions shows radial artery grafts utilized on coronary lesions with quantitative flow ratio > 0.71 exhibited a high risk of occlusion https://t.co/3BMkAdNSPR https://t.co/LAUbimGhe0
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation - 6 month(s) ago
In medicine, the results of clinical trials are considered one of the most trustworthy forms of scientific evidence that can be generated. Consequently, the medical community relies on researchers running trials to publish timely summaries of their results to share new discoveries, identify areas for future research (as well as research ‘dead ends’) and ultimately to ensure patients receive the best and safest medical treatments available. However, previous research has shown that for approximately half of clinical trials, results are not reported in a timely manner or at all.1–4 For example, one of these studies reported that between 2006 and 2016, the results of over 11 000 completed clinical trials (enrolling 8.7 million patients) still had not been shared with doctors, researchers or patients.3 Non-publication of completed clinical trials has been identified as a major contributor to research waste.5 Addressing this problem and enhancing the transparency of clinical trial results a
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet-
Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation #ResearchLetter by @danielghamilton and colleagues Link: https://t.co/GGS65vJSnq https://t.co/bEOCXdcBzo
-
-
Mashup Score: 0Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation - 7 month(s) ago
In medicine, the results of clinical trials are considered one of the most trustworthy forms of scientific evidence that can be generated. Consequently, the medical community relies on researchers running trials to publish timely summaries of their results to share new discoveries, identify areas for future research (as well as research ‘dead ends’) and ultimately to ensure patients receive the best and safest medical treatments available. However, previous research has shown that for approximately half of clinical trials, results are not reported in a timely manner or at all.1–4 For example, one of these studies reported that between 2006 and 2016, the results of over 11 000 completed clinical trials (enrolling 8.7 million patients) still had not been shared with doctors, researchers or patients.3 Non-publication of completed clinical trials has been identified as a major contributor to research waste.5 Addressing this problem and enhancing the transparency of clinical trial results a
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: Latest Headlines, PayerTweet-
Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation #ResearchLetter by @danielghamilton and colleagues Link: https://t.co/GGS65vJSnq https://t.co/Zbeobx2S5I
-
-
Mashup Score: 7
TO THE EDITOR:
Source: ashpublications.orgCategories: Hem/Onc News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
Acquired BTK mutations associated with resistance to noncovalent BTK inhibitors https://t.co/RJeTcElmaB #researchletter #lymphoidneoplasia
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation - 7 month(s) ago
In medicine, the results of clinical trials are considered one of the most trustworthy forms of scientific evidence that can be generated. Consequently, the medical community relies on researchers running trials to publish timely summaries of their results to share new discoveries, identify areas for future research (as well as research ‘dead ends’) and ultimately to ensure patients receive the best and safest medical treatments available. However, previous research has shown that for approximately half of clinical trials, results are not reported in a timely manner or at all.1–4 For example, one of these studies reported that between 2006 and 2016, the results of over 11 000 completed clinical trials (enrolling 8.7 million patients) still had not been shared with doctors, researchers or patients.3 Non-publication of completed clinical trials has been identified as a major contributor to research waste.5 Addressing this problem and enhancing the transparency of clinical trial results a
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: Latest Headlines, PayerTweet-
Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation #ResearchLetter by @danielghamilton and colleagues Link: https://t.co/GGS65vJSnq https://t.co/jHYyVh1Vm0
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation - 7 month(s) ago
In medicine, the results of clinical trials are considered one of the most trustworthy forms of scientific evidence that can be generated. Consequently, the medical community relies on researchers running trials to publish timely summaries of their results to share new discoveries, identify areas for future research (as well as research ‘dead ends’) and ultimately to ensure patients receive the best and safest medical treatments available. However, previous research has shown that for approximately half of clinical trials, results are not reported in a timely manner or at all.1–4 For example, one of these studies reported that between 2006 and 2016, the results of over 11 000 completed clinical trials (enrolling 8.7 million patients) still had not been shared with doctors, researchers or patients.3 Non-publication of completed clinical trials has been identified as a major contributor to research waste.5 Addressing this problem and enhancing the transparency of clinical trial results a
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: Latest Headlines, PayerTweet-
Attitudes of people living with cancer towards trial non-publication and research participation #ResearchLetter by @danielghamilton and colleagues Link: https://t.co/GGS65vJSnq https://t.co/bEOCXdcBzo
-
Enhanced access but increased testing with virtual care: insights from a multinational survey #ResearchLetter by @rkmetcalfe and colleagues Link: https://t.co/MoRPr5jaUB https://t.co/2Vy4GwQgdM