• Mashup Score: 1

    side (pay-for-performance, capitation) and demand-side [conditional cash transfers (CCT), vouchers] financing interventions focused on improving hypertension outcomes in primary care settings. Our review confirmed the paucity of studies, especially from LMICs. Pay-for-performance and capitation had small effects on screening, prescription practices, and blood pressure (BP) control. CCTs had mixed effects on screening and modest effects on BP control. Information on causal pathways, unintended consequences, and the use of vouchers was sparse. We then developed a conceptual model identifying pathways through which financing interventions influence hypertension outcomes. Based on this model, simulations in the context of Bangladesh indicated that pay-for-performance demands substantial financial resources but could become more favorable with increased treatment coverage….

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Hot off the press: A new article from our team @JohnsHopkinsSPH about health financing interventions (eg pay-for-performance) and #hypertension control: 1⃣narrative review 2⃣conceptual framework 3⃣hypothetical simulation @ResolveTSL @JohnsHopkinsEPI https://t.co/umgvnsUVZx