• Mashup Score: 2

    Background Aponermin, a circularly permuted tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, is a potential death receptor 4/5-targeted antitumour candidate. Previous phase 1/2 studies have demonstrated the efficacy of aponermin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). To confirm the superiority of aponermin plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (aponermin group) over placebo plus thalidomide and dexamethasone (placebo group) in RRMM, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled phase 3 trial was performed. Methods Four hundred seventeen patients with RRMM who had previously received at least two regimens were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive aponermin, thalidomide, and dexamethasone or placebo, thalidomide, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 415 patients received at least one dose of trial treatment (276

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • It speaks to the global inequities in cancer care/access that a trial with a thalidomide-dex doublet as a control arm for relapsed/refractory myeloma is published in 2023. Realities for most patients in the world very different. 🤯💔 https://t.co/wOJBeQ9Rtf #mmsm https://t.co/ixkIWhB0d4 https://t.co/Xv8v0OwakG

  • Mashup Score: 2

    Background The association between gastrointestinal cancer and types of meat consumption, including red meat, processed meat, or a combination of both, remains disputable. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to estimate the association between meat consumption and gastrointestinal cancer risk. Methods PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library databases were searched systematically for eligible studies that investigated the relation between meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers, including esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), colon cancer (CC), rectal cancer (RC), pancreatic cancer (PC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) throughout February, 2023. The pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was assigned as an effect estimate and calculated using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Results Forty cohorts comprising 3,780,590 individ

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • A systematic review and meta-analysis published in #BMCCancer finds that higher meat consumption is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancers irrespective of whether it was red, processed, or total red and processed meat. https://t.co/9aaxbpRq4N

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Background The association between gastrointestinal cancer and types of meat consumption, including red meat, processed meat, or a combination of both, remains disputable. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to estimate the association between meat consumption and gastrointestinal cancer risk. Methods PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library databases were searched systematically for eligible studies that investigated the relation between meat consumption and the risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers, including esophageal cancer (EC), gastric cancer (GC), colorectal cancer (CRC), colon cancer (CC), rectal cancer (RC), pancreatic cancer (PC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) throughout February, 2023. The pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was assigned as an effect estimate and calculated using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Results Forty cohorts comprising 3,780,590 individ

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Association of meat consumption with the risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Cancer | Full Text https://t.co/wJukI0bjAJ

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Background Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and combination therapy across several indications, both among newly-diagnosed and refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there is limited evidence on treatment patterns and effectiveness of daratumumab in the real-world setting, particularly in first line (1 L). This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients initiating daratumumab across different lines of therapy. Methods A retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating daratumumab between November 2015 and March 2021 was conducted at two clinical sites in the United States. De-identified patient-level data were abstracted in an electronic case report form. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and time to next line of therapy were reported using descri

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Reference 27 is a two center US study receiving dara from 2015- early 2021. https://t.co/y5jcyiyEFH This included patients in newly diagnosed MM, but even in those with 3+ lines of therapy, dara based combos more common than dara monotherapy. https://t.co/sf3KF13uOa