• Mashup Score: 0

    Background Treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer must balance patient preferences, oncologic risk, and preservation of sexual, urinary and bowel function. While Active Surveillance (AS) is the recommended option for men with Grade Group 1 (Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6) prostate cancer without other intermediate-risk features, men with Grade Group 2 (Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7) are typically recommended active treatment. For select patients, AS can be a possible initial management strategy for men with Grade Group 2. Herein, we review current urology guidelines and the urologic literature regarding recommendations and evidence for AS for this patient group. Main body AS benefits men with prostate cancer by maintaining their current quality of life and avoiding treatment side effects. AS protocols with close follow up always allow for an option to change course and pursue curative treatment. All the major guideline organizations now include Grade Group 2 disease with slightly differi

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Two Comments published in BMC urology discuss AS in patients with intermediate-risk, grade group 2 prostate cancer, highlighting how AS should not be routinely used in this population, but might be offered to selected patients https://t.co/C9l16SZNhC https://t.co/Fe6YuBm9WR

  • Mashup Score: 0

    This prognostic study assesses the prognostic and predictive value of the modified Glasgow prognostic score during treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • A new research in @JAMANetwork shows that longitudinal measurement of systemic inflammatory response (through mGPS) in patients with mRCC provides valuable prognostic information and could integrate radiological staging in therapy monitoring https://t.co/Y3DKfRGyn8