-
Mashup Score: 2
Can’t sign in? Forgot your password? If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Can’t sign in? Forgot your username? Ann Intern Med. 2024;177:559-572. Published 19 April 2024. doi:10.7326/M23-2309 This retrospective cohort study evaluated the use of 7 recently approved antibiotics (ceftazidime–avibactam, ceftolozane–tazobactam, meropenem–vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, imipenem–relebactam–cilastatin, and cefiderocol) in treating
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, General Journals & SocietTweet
-
Mashup Score: 381
Background: Systematic reviews are performed manually despite the exponential growth of scientific literature. Objective: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of GPT-3.5 Turbo, from OpenAI, as a single reviewer, for title and abstract screening in systematic reviews. Design: Diagnostic test accuracy study. Setting: Unannotated bibliographic databases from 5 systematic reviews representing 22 665 citations. Participants: None. Measurements: A generic prompt framework to instruct GPT to perform title and abstract screening was designed. The output of the model was compared with decisions from authors under 2 rules. The first rule balanced sensitivity and specificity, for example, to act as a second reviewer. The second rule optimized sensitivity, for example, to reduce the number of citations to be manually screened. Results: Under the balanced rule, sensitivities ranged from 81.1% to 96.5% and specificities ranged from 25.8% to 80.4%. Across all reviews, GPT identified 7 of 70
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Expert PicksTweet-
You are doing a systematic review of the literature. Can large language models help? https://t.co/jIwq3Wh6Ho "Without specific training, GPT models have sensitivities on par with single human reviewers and may be used as a second (or third) reviewer" @AnnalsofIM @thitran3 @APHP… https://t.co/9j2qCXgrob https://t.co/1NzvqpHQIr
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Annals Consult Guys - Acute Coronary Syndrome and Anemia: When to Transfuse? | Annals of Internal Medicine - 7 day(s) ago
The Annals Consult Guys discuss the vexing question of the hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in a patient with anemia and acute coronary syndrome.
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, General HCPsTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2Attending | Annals of Internal Medicine - 8 day(s) ago
Can’t sign in? Forgot your password? If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Can’t sign in? Forgot your username? View all available purchase options and get full access to this article. McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, Houston, Texas Corresponding Author: Sylvia S. Villarreal, MEd, MPH, 6431 Fannin Street, Suite JJL 410, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail, [email protected]. If you have the appropriate software installed, you can
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, General Journals & SocietTweet
-
Mashup Score: 381
Background: Systematic reviews are performed manually despite the exponential growth of scientific literature. Objective: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of GPT-3.5 Turbo, from OpenAI, as a single reviewer, for title and abstract screening in systematic reviews. Design: Diagnostic test accuracy study. Setting: Unannotated bibliographic databases from 5 systematic reviews representing 22 665 citations. Participants: None. Measurements: A generic prompt framework to instruct GPT to perform title and abstract screening was designed. The output of the model was compared with decisions from authors under 2 rules. The first rule balanced sensitivity and specificity, for example, to act as a second reviewer. The second rule optimized sensitivity, for example, to reduce the number of citations to be manually screened. Results: Under the balanced rule, sensitivities ranged from 81.1% to 96.5% and specificities ranged from 25.8% to 80.4%. Across all reviews, GPT identified 7 of 70
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Expert PicksTweet-
You are doing a systematic review of the literature. Can large language models help? https://t.co/jIwq3Wh6Ho "Without specific training, GPT models have sensitivities on par with single human reviewers and may be used as a second (or third) reviewer" @AnnalsofIM @thitran3 @APHP… https://t.co/9j2qCXgrob https://t.co/1NzvqpHQIr
-
-
Mashup Score: 9Moving Beyond Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections | Annals of Internal Medicine - 8 day(s) ago
Reporting of hospital-acquired conditions has transformed patient safety, quality, and reimbursement of care. A new era of quality reporting focusing on digital direct methods to source data is now…
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, HIV/AIDSTweet
-
Mashup Score: 5
Can’t sign in? Forgot your password? If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Can’t sign in? Forgot your username? The mission of the Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases (AIMCC) is to promote excellence in critical thinking around prevention, diagnosis, and management of challenging clinical situations and awareness of new or unique clinical entities by disseminating rigorously peer-reviewed reports of real clinical cases
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiac SurgeryTweet
-
Mashup Score: 5
Can’t sign in? Forgot your password? If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Can’t sign in? Forgot your username? Time-restricted eating (TRE) lowers body weight in many studies, but whether it induces weight loss independent of reductions in caloric intake, as observed in rodent studies, is unknown. This randomized trial compared the effect of time on weight loss when caloric intake is controlled, with eating limited to a 10-hour
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, General Journals & SocietTweet
-
Mashup Score: 380
Background: Systematic reviews are performed manually despite the exponential growth of scientific literature. Objective: To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of GPT-3.5 Turbo, from OpenAI, as a single reviewer, for title and abstract screening in systematic reviews. Design: Diagnostic test accuracy study. Setting: Unannotated bibliographic databases from 5 systematic reviews representing 22 665 citations. Participants: None. Measurements: A generic prompt framework to instruct GPT to perform title and abstract screening was designed. The output of the model was compared with decisions from authors under 2 rules. The first rule balanced sensitivity and specificity, for example, to act as a second reviewer. The second rule optimized sensitivity, for example, to reduce the number of citations to be manually screened. Results: Under the balanced rule, sensitivities ranged from 81.1% to 96.5% and specificities ranged from 25.8% to 80.4%. Across all reviews, GPT identified 7 of 70
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Expert PicksTweet-
You are doing a systematic review of the literature. Can large language models help? https://t.co/jIwq3Wh6Ho "Without specific training, GPT models have sensitivities on par with single human reviewers and may be used as a second (or third) reviewer" @AnnalsofIM @thitran3 @APHP… https://t.co/9j2qCXgrob https://t.co/1NzvqpHQIr
-
-
Mashup Score: 103
Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a precursor of multiple myeloma (MM) and related conditions. In previous registry-based, retrospective studies, autoimmune diseases have been associated with MGUS. However, these studies were not based on a screened population and are therefore prone to ascertainment bias. Objective: To examine whether MGUS is associated with autoimmune diseases. Design: A cross-sectional study within iStopMM (Iceland Screens, Treats, or Prevents MM), a prospective, population-based screening study of MGUS. Setting: Icelandic population of adults aged 40 years or older. Patients: 75 422 persons screened for MGUS. Measurements: Poisson regression for prevalence ratios (PRs) of MGUS among persons with or without an autoimmune disease, adjusted for age and sex. Results: A total of 10 818 participants had an autoimmune disorder, of whom 599 had MGUS (61 with a prior clinical diagnosis and 538 diagnosed at study screening or evaluation
Source: www.acpjournals.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet
The May 2024 #AnnalsForHospitalists provides helpful summaries of recent Annals research relevant to #hospitalists: https://t.co/ukTXUdKMtB https://t.co/PTLecliwSw