-
Mashup Score: 1Menu - Kogi BBQ Taco Truck & Catering - 1 month(s) ago
Kogi menu descriptions and pricing for tacos, burritos, mulitas, Kogi dogs, kimchi quesadillas, blackjack quesadillas and short rib sliders.
Source: kogibbq.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet
-
Mashup Score: 14Robotic Common Bile Duct Transection with Loss of Confluence Strasberg E4, submitted to SAGES 2024 - 2 month(s) ago
This version of the case recording is the video abstract submitted for consideration to the annual SAGES meeting in 2024. The edits, overlays, narration scri…
Source: www.youtube.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
Just leaving this screenshot of a CBD injury with hilar-disruption presented at @SAGES_Updates just this past year as a cautionary tale. And this was with 4 ports. Full video: https://t.co/Gc4MxTeD9m https://t.co/px89qzHOyd
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Pulmonary Embolism at Multi–Detector Row CT of Chest: One-year Survival of Treated and Untreated Patients | Radiology - 2 month(s) ago
Purpose: To retrospectively assess outcome in patients with clinically unsuspected pulmonary embolism (PE) at chest multi–detector row computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required. PE was assessed in consecutive CT scans in 1966 patients (mean age, 60 years; range, 15–96 years; male-female ratio, 1.79) and graded with severity score. Studies with true-positive and false-negative radiologic diagnoses were determined. Coexisting morbidity, anticoagulant therapy (ACT), complications, and 1-year outcome were reviewed. Statistical evaluation included Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, Poisson regression, and Kaplan-Meier statistics. Results: Scans were PE positive in 117 patients. Clinical data review was complete in 96 patients; 63 of 96 patients had malignancy; in 58, PE was not suspected. In 38 of these 58 patients, radiology report findings were false-negative (mean severity score, 20.21 ± 17.88 [standard deviatio
Source: pubs.rsna.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
@VPrasadMDMPH It takes ~15 years before evidence changes clinical practice. Which means we’re about 3 years late now? Anticoagulation for clinically asx PE didn’t improve overall survival, but ⬆️ bleeding complications. https://t.co/1P3J6pDxyY
-
-
Mashup Score: 8
For the semiannual American Board of Surgery Certifying Exam (CE), effective strategies and high yield concepts across several surgical fields are discussed with example questions and prior experiences shared to help prepare trainees. This webinar is intended to give candidate examinees key insight into the structure and content of the General Surgery Certifying Exams, including tips and updates on how to manage likely scenarios across a spectrum of topics by specialty. At the completion of this webinar, participants should be able to: • Understand the structure and content of the General Surgery Certifying Exams • Learn tips and tricks for successful preparation for the boards • Learn how to manage scenarios from various specialties included on the General Surgery Certifying Exam
Source: us02web.zoom.usCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
RT @SSATNews: Register today for the SSAT Certifying Exam Prep Webinar Aug. 22 at 6:00 pm https://t.co/UyvHI2nHeq https://t.co/CEFIOrItbo
-
-
Mashup Score: 6SSAT - Past Webinars - 5 month(s) ago
The objectives of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract are: to stimulate, foster, and provide surgical leadership in the art and science of atient care; to teach and research the diseases and functions of the alimentary tract; to provide a forum for the presentation of such knowledge; and to encourage training opportunities, funding, and scientific publications supporting the foregoing activities.
Source: ssat.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
RT @SSATNews: Did you miss this on Monday? You can now watch on the SSAT YouTube channel https://t.co/PunqUvPYU0 https://t.co/TzLRo9VrBa
-
-
Mashup Score: 153
ficant results could lead to inappropriate recommendations that increase health care costs and treatment toxicity. Methods: CER studies from 2022 issues of the Annals of Surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Research, and Journal of the American College of Surgeons were systematically reviewed by 2 different investigators. The primary outcome of interest was whether the authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in the “Methods.” Results: Of 307 reviewed studies, 162 were clinical trials and 145 were observational studies. Authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in 26 studies (8.5%). Clinical significance was defined using clinically validated standards in 25 studies and subjectively in 1 study. Seven studies (2.3%) recommended a change in clinical decision-making, all with primary outcomes achieving statistical significance. Five (71.4%) of t
Source: journals.lww.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists1Tweet-
Grateful to @AnnalsofSurgery for publishing our study as June’s Feature article! https://t.co/kdi0sLWd17 Ever come across📝that 📢 stat sig (p<0.05), but with small diff btw study arms for it to be clinically meaningful? How pervasive is this? We’ve got you covered in this🧵: https://t.co/mCjn1k9ImX
-
-
Mashup Score: 5
An abstract is unavailable.
Source: journals.lww.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
While this isn’t earth-shattering, intent was to reshine🔦on an ⬆️important issue. This has implications on FDA/NICE approval of drugs&devices. We join Dr Clavien’s call for action in his Editorial. We need to figure this out or someone else will for us! https://t.co/bQpNUdtCAf https://t.co/p6d5jAM8BJ
-
-
Mashup Score: 142
ficant results could lead to inappropriate recommendations that increase health care costs and treatment toxicity. Methods: CER studies from 2022 issues of the Annals of Surgery, Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Research, and Journal of the American College of Surgeons were systematically reviewed by 2 different investigators. The primary outcome of interest was whether the authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in the “Methods.” Results: Of 307 reviewed studies, 162 were clinical trials and 145 were observational studies. Authors specified what they considered to be a clinically significant difference in 26 studies (8.5%). Clinical significance was defined using clinically validated standards in 25 studies and subjectively in 1 study. Seven studies (2.3%) recommended a change in clinical decision-making, all with primary outcomes achieving statistical significance. Five (71.4%) of t
Source: journals.lww.comCategories: General Medicine News, Oncologists1Tweet-
Grateful to @AnnalsofSurgery for publishing our study as June’s Feature article! https://t.co/kdi0sLWd17 Ever come across📝that 📢 stat sig (p<0.05), but with small diff btw study arms for it to be clinically meaningful? How pervasive is this? We’ve got you covered in this🧵: https://t.co/mCjn1k9ImX
-
-
Mashup Score: 10
This webinar will consist of 3-4 concise, high-yield presentations geared towards helping to prepare trainees for the General Surgery Boards. The topics will include but not be limited to: general orientation to the format of the boards, strategies for preparation, and tips and common pitfalls from recent exam takers. At the completion of this webinar, participants should be able to: • Understand the general format and components of the ABS Board exams • Be able to create or augment a study plan for the ABS Qualifying exam • Understand general strategies for preparation for the ABS Certifying exam • Understand what resources are available and recommended for both first-time and potentially repeat test-takers of the ABS General Surgery Board exams
Source: us02web.zoom.usCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
RT @SSATNews: Don't miss this webinar on June 17! Preparing for the ABS General Surgery Boards Register here: https://t.co/lhVFtRG24b https…
-
-
Mashup Score: 3Thomas E. Clancy, MD, Named MGB Endowed Chair - 8 month(s) ago
Thomas E. Clancy, MDDirector, Pancreas Surgery, Division of Surgical OncologyCo-Director, Pancreatic and Biliary Tumor Center, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer CenterDirector, Program in Robotic/Minimally Invasive Pancreatic and Liver Surgery, Brigham and Women’s HospitalAssociate Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School Dr. Clancy is a senior surgeon and Distinguished Scholar in Surgical Oncology in the Department of Surgery…
Source: www.brighamsurgerynews.comCategories: General Medicine News, Hem/OncsTweet-
RT @BrighamSurgery: Congratulations to @TClancyMD who has been named an endowed chair @MassGenBrigham! https://t.co/au8pMoxTeO https://t.c…
-
RT @SAGES_Updates: @ZhiVenFongMD Ahem. https://t.co/TWPbfztl79