-
Mashup Score: 25Reporting health and medical research - 2 day(s) ago
The use of the best available evidence to inform patient care in evidence-based medicine is reliant on the accurate, complete and transparent reporting of health and medical research. Without a complete and transparent account of what was done and what was found during a research study, findings cannot be fully understood, replicated, assessed for validity and applicability, and used to inform clinical and policy decisions. For over 50 years, problems of incomplete and poor reporting of research have been widely documented across health and medical research.1–3 Unusable research reports contribute to avoidable research waste4 through the inability to appraise and synthesise research and can detrimentally impact patient care through incorrect implementation of research findings.5 Because of this, complete and transparent reporting of research is a researcher’s moral and ethical responsibility to maximise the usefulness and positive impact of their research.6 Our objective in this articl
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 25Reporting health and medical research - 6 day(s) ago
The use of the best available evidence to inform patient care in evidence-based medicine is reliant on the accurate, complete and transparent reporting of health and medical research. Without a complete and transparent account of what was done and what was found during a research study, findings cannot be fully understood, replicated, assessed for validity and applicability, and used to inform clinical and policy decisions. For over 50 years, problems of incomplete and poor reporting of research have been widely documented across health and medical research.1–3 Unusable research reports contribute to avoidable research waste4 through the inability to appraise and synthesise research and can detrimentally impact patient care through incorrect implementation of research findings.5 Because of this, complete and transparent reporting of research is a researcher’s moral and ethical responsibility to maximise the usefulness and positive impact of their research.6 Our objective in this articl
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 24Reporting health and medical research - 14 day(s) ago
The use of the best available evidence to inform patient care in evidence-based medicine is reliant on the accurate, complete and transparent reporting of health and medical research. Without a complete and transparent account of what was done and what was found during a research study, findings cannot be fully understood, replicated, assessed for validity and applicability, and used to inform clinical and policy decisions. For over 50 years, problems of incomplete and poor reporting of research have been widely documented across health and medical research.1–3 Unusable research reports contribute to avoidable research waste4 through the inability to appraise and synthesise research and can detrimentally impact patient care through incorrect implementation of research findings.5 Because of this, complete and transparent reporting of research is a researcher’s moral and ethical responsibility to maximise the usefulness and positive impact of their research.6 Our objective in this articl
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 5Differences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide - 3 month(s) ago
Shared decision-making (SDM) integrates clinical evidence with patient preferences in established healthcare systems. More and more countries are focusing on the role of SDM in clinical settings and specific implementation strategies. However, the global distribution of research on SDM is extremely unequal, and there are also significant differences in the perception of SDM across regions and cultures. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss in depth the East-West differences of SDM in the hope of laying the foundation for future global SDM development in an equitable manner. In this analysis, we discuss cultural differences in SDM in a broad sense: the development of SDM, collectivism and the role of the family in SDM, challenges in the communication, etc. These issues may provide new insights to address the global development and implementation of SDM. In Western countries (defined as dominance of Western ideology, such as the European Union and the Five Eyes Alliance, an intelligence-
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 5Differences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide - 4 month(s) ago
Shared decision-making (SDM) integrates clinical evidence with patient preferences in established healthcare systems. More and more countries are focusing on the role of SDM in clinical settings and specific implementation strategies. However, the global distribution of research on SDM is extremely unequal, and there are also significant differences in the perception of SDM across regions and cultures. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss in depth the East-West differences of SDM in the hope of laying the foundation for future global SDM development in an equitable manner. In this analysis, we discuss cultural differences in SDM in a broad sense: the development of SDM, collectivism and the role of the family in SDM, challenges in the communication, etc. These issues may provide new insights to address the global development and implementation of SDM. In Western countries (defined as dominance of Western ideology, such as the European Union and the Five Eyes Alliance, an intelligence-
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 5Differences in shared decision-making: the East-West divide - 4 month(s) ago
Shared decision-making (SDM) integrates clinical evidence with patient preferences in established healthcare systems. More and more countries are focusing on the role of SDM in clinical settings and specific implementation strategies. However, the global distribution of research on SDM is extremely unequal, and there are also significant differences in the perception of SDM across regions and cultures. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss in depth the East-West differences of SDM in the hope of laying the foundation for future global SDM development in an equitable manner. In this analysis, we discuss cultural differences in SDM in a broad sense: the development of SDM, collectivism and the role of the family in SDM, challenges in the communication, etc. These issues may provide new insights to address the global development and implementation of SDM. In Western countries (defined as dominance of Western ideology, such as the European Union and the Five Eyes Alliance, an intelligence-
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2
The development of knowledge is for the most part a gradual and iterative process by which every new study either confirms, extends or refutes what has been reported in previous ones. In evidence-based medicine, ideally a finding should be replicated by multiple studies before it can inform policy or practice decisions. While there is ongoing debate about the exact definition of replication, it is clear that replication has an irrefutable role in establishing the credibility of scientific findings.1 Nearly two decades ago, scientists declared a ‘replication crisis’ on demonstrating that results of a disproportionately high number of published studies in psychology and medicine could not be replicated.2 3 Under the pressure of academic policies and norms that incentivise novelty and positive findings, researchers have been steering away from replication studies, favouring publishability over credibility.1 4 Several interventions and solutions have since emerged in response to the crisis
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2
The development of knowledge is for the most part a gradual and iterative process by which every new study either confirms, extends or refutes what has been reported in previous ones. In evidence-based medicine, ideally a finding should be replicated by multiple studies before it can inform policy or practice decisions. While there is ongoing debate about the exact definition of replication, it is clear that replication has an irrefutable role in establishing the credibility of scientific findings.1 Nearly two decades ago, scientists declared a ‘replication crisis’ on demonstrating that results of a disproportionately high number of published studies in psychology and medicine could not be replicated.2 3 Under the pressure of academic policies and norms that incentivise novelty and positive findings, researchers have been steering away from replication studies, favouring publishability over credibility.1 4 Several interventions and solutions have since emerged in response to the crisis
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2
The development of knowledge is for the most part a gradual and iterative process by which every new study either confirms, extends or refutes what has been reported in previous ones. In evidence-based medicine, ideally a finding should be replicated by multiple studies before it can inform policy or practice decisions. While there is ongoing debate about the exact definition of replication, it is clear that replication has an irrefutable role in establishing the credibility of scientific findings.1 Nearly two decades ago, scientists declared a ‘replication crisis’ on demonstrating that results of a disproportionately high number of published studies in psychology and medicine could not be replicated.2 3 Under the pressure of academic policies and norms that incentivise novelty and positive findings, researchers have been steering away from replication studies, favouring publishability over credibility.1 4 Several interventions and solutions have since emerged in response to the crisis
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2
The development of knowledge is for the most part a gradual and iterative process by which every new study either confirms, extends or refutes what has been reported in previous ones. In evidence-based medicine, ideally a finding should be replicated by multiple studies before it can inform policy or practice decisions. While there is ongoing debate about the exact definition of replication, it is clear that replication has an irrefutable role in establishing the credibility of scientific findings.1 Nearly two decades ago, scientists declared a ‘replication crisis’ on demonstrating that results of a disproportionately high number of published studies in psychology and medicine could not be replicated.2 3 Under the pressure of academic policies and norms that incentivise novelty and positive findings, researchers have been steering away from replication studies, favouring publishability over credibility.1 4 Several interventions and solutions have since emerged in response to the crisis
Source: ebm.bmj.comCategories: General Medicine News, PayerTweet
Reporting health and medical research Part of the OA series - #Analysis led by @HJHansford et al. Link: https://t.co/Gn5kgVc7dg https://t.co/9C3dDkv41r