• Mashup Score: 0

    A frequent feature of pharmaceutical research is the open label extension study, in which patients participating in double blind placebo controlled trials of new medications are invited, on completion of the initial trial, to take the study drug for some further period. Patients are openly given the active substance at this stage, regardless of their assignment in the initial trial. Investigators…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
  • Mashup Score: 1

    Jeff Nisker describes his personal experience of a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer and the kindnesses he received from friendly doctors. He claims that this narrative account supports the promotion of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening for asymptomatic men and impugns statisticians, mistakenly thinking that their opposition to PSA screening derives from concerns about financial cost….

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Is one narrative enough? Analytical tools should match the problems they address https://t.co/TeOhTXlohK via @NathanHodson & @susan_bewley

  • Mashup Score: 9

    We thank Leo Lam and Taylor Nichols for their response1 to our paper ‘COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk–benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities’.2 In our paper, we demonstrate that the risk–benefit calculus to mandate boosters for young adults aged 18–29 is a net risk intervention. The authors assert that we have made three inappropriate…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Finally, not unrelated, here is our (now open access) recently-written rebuttal about why college covid booster mandates are & always were unethical. w/@KrugAlli @sdbaral @ID_ethics @s_keshavjee @TrudoLemmens @VPrasadMDMPH @MartyMakary & @KevinBardosh https://t.co/TOjpykt9We https://t.co/Lf6F20U0aK

  • Mashup Score: 3

    We thank Leo Lam and Taylor Nichols for their response1 to our paper ‘COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk–benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities’.2 In our paper, we demonstrate that the risk–benefit calculus to mandate boosters for young adults aged 18–29 is a net risk intervention. The authors assert that we have made three inappropriate…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • If I am trash, it's not bc of the 38 quid people are being charged to read our publication, none of which is going to our research group! @bmj_jme wanted to charge us >$3800 for open access but we did not receive any funding for this publication. I'm sorry https://t.co/SWmSLCj0rD https://t.co/odWX19IEJ6 https://t.co/VmlEVBSDsg

  • Mashup Score: 2

    Developmentally, adolescence sits in transition between childhood and adulthood. Involving adolescents in their medical decision-making prompts important and complex ethical questions. Originating in the UK, the concept of Gillick competence is a dominant framework for navigating adolescent medical decision-making from legal, ethical and clinical perspectives and is commonly treated as…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Gillick competence: an inadequate guide to the ethics of involving adolescents in decision-making https://t.co/PehL5mIRy6 via @UniMelb researchers

  • Mashup Score: 3

    When a minor research participant reaches the age of majority or the level of maturity necessary to be granted legal decision-making capacity, reconsent can be required for ongoing participation in research or use of health information and banked biological materials. Despite potential logistical concerns with implementation and ethical questions about the trade-offs between maximising respect…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • "...reconsent of paediatric participants upon obtaining capacity should be explicit and informed in Canada, and should not be presumed from continued participation alone." Our new paper: Reconsenting paediatric research participants https://t.co/D7udTdcdXh with @BlakeMMurdoch