• Mashup Score: 2

    Background Policy is receiving increasing attention in the field of implementation science. However, there remains a lack of clear, concise guidance about how policy can be conceptualized in implementation science research. Building on Curran’s article “Implementation science made too simple”—which defines “the thing” as the intervention, practice, or innovation in need of implementation support—we offer a typology of four very basic ways to conceptualize policy in implementation science research. We provide examples of studies that have conceptualized policy in these different ways and connect aspects of the typology to established frameworks in the field. The typology simplifies and refines related typologies in the field. Four very basic ways to think about policy in implementation science research. 1) Policy as something to adopt: an evidence-supported policy proposal is conceptualized as “the thing” and the goal of research is to understand how policymaking processes can be modifi

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Four very basic ways to think about policy in implementation science https://t.co/bhvstVHhaS via @cmoucheraud et al https://t.co/dAXY8KSumW

  • Mashup Score: 1

    Background As the focus has grown in recent years on both engaged research and dissemination and implementation (D&I) research, so too has federal funding to support these areas. The purpose of this analysis is to provide an overall perspective about the range of practices and approaches being used to engage partners in D&I research, with special attention to disparities-relevant research, and to identify gaps and opportunities in research funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) in this space. Methods This analysis examined a portfolio of active D&I research grants funded in fiscal years 2020 and 2021 across the NIH. Grant applications were deductively coded and summary statistics were calculated. Cross-tabulations were used to identify trends by engagement and disparities foci. Results There were 103 grants included in the portfolio, of which 87% contained some form of community or partner engagement, and 50% of engaged grants were relevant to health disparities. Engageme

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • .@ImplementSci: Article outlines several gaps in the @NIH #implementation science portfolio and describes opportunities for increasing engagement to improve the #quality of D&I research and application to advancing #HealthEquity. #ImpSci @NIHfunding Read: https://t.co/CTc85zAcIZ https://t.co/81szSjwGb3