-
Mashup Score: 0What can we learn from results of the RoB 2 comparison study? - 3 year(s) ago
The full report of a Cochrane-funded study designed to compare the existing and revised Cochrane risk of bias tools for RCTs was finalised in June 2021 and has now been made available to the Cochrane community.
Source: community.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 7Cochrane Methods Report 2020 - 3 year(s) ago
News
Source: methods.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
The Cochrane Methods Report 2020 is out – read about methods in Cochrane’s #COVID19 response, #RoB2, the Methods Support Unit, Methods Groups' achievements & developments for Cochrane Handbooks & the methods community: https://t.co/M6AnB9K095 @cochranemthds
-
-
Mashup Score: 0Methods Support Unit Web Clinic Schedule - 3 year(s) ago
November 2020WelcomeKerry Dwan, Methods Support Unit Lead and Statistical Editor, Editorial and Methods Department, Cochrane Central ExecutiveWhat you need to know about Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) in Cochrane – an overview of recent communications and updates (see here)Ella Flemyng, Methods Implementation Manager, Editorial and Methods Department, Cochrane Central ExecutiveWhat should be included in…
Source: methods.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
🤓 November Methods Support Unit Web Clinic Agenda: 26 Nov 2020 16:00-17:00 UTC 1) What you need to know about #RoB2 in Cochrane 2) What should be included in a Cochrane Review that uses RoB 2 3) Common errors seen so far in Cochrane Reviews using RoB 2 https://t.co/vtVEp5YseS https://t.co/HaKkV0r5mv
-
-
Mashup Score: 0Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology | Cochrane Library - 3 year(s) ago
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Our confidence in the results of research studies is affected by how they are designed, conducted and reported. In ideal circumstances, all studies would accurately determine the true effect of a health care intervention. However, studies do not take place in an ideal world, and flaws or problems in the way they are conducted could lead to them…
Source: www.cochranelibrary.comCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
New @CochraneLibrary Editorial - Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology https://t.co/IZfPKdwrhu #RoB2
-
-
Mashup Score: 1What we’ve learnt from the Risk of Bias 2 Pilot in Cochrane - 3 year(s) ago
Posted on 19 November 2020 by Ella Flemyng (Methods Implementation Manager)A year ago, at the 2019 Cochrane Governance Meetings, we hosted a Strategic Session on the implementation of the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool to gain feedback from the community. In this post, we highlight how that feedback has been integrated into the plans for RoB 2 and what we have learnt during the initial pilot phase….
Source: methods.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
#RoB2 - @EllaFlemyng summarises learning from pilot of revised @cochranemthds #RiskofBias tool https://t.co/fn78PhELrS
-
-
Mashup Score: 1Status and expectations of implementation of Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane intervention reviews - 3 year(s) ago
The following statement has been approved by Karla Soares-Weiser (Editor-in Chief) and the Cochrane Editorial Board This statement addresses the question of when and how Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs) should advise authors to adopt the revised Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) in Cochrane intervention reviews. Based on the findings of a pilot that has been conducted within Cochrane and the current status…
Source: community.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
What's the status & expectations of the implementation of Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane intervention reviews? Read the statement from the Cochrane Editorial Board with recommendations for Cochrane Review Groups https://t.co/96zVDgqIkj #RoB2 @cochranemthds https://t.co/2nZ8zaace9
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology | Cochrane Library - 3 year(s) ago
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Our confidence in the results of research studies is affected by how they are designed, conducted and reported. In ideal circumstances, all studies would accurately determine the true effect of a health care intervention. However, studies do not take place in an ideal world, and flaws or problems in the way they are conducted could lead to them…
Source: www.cochranelibrary.comCategories: General Medicine News, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
New @CochraneLibrary Editorial - Risk of Bias 2 in Cochrane Reviews: a phased approach for the introduction of new methodology https://t.co/7c4EL0BLFN #RoB2
-
-
Mashup Score: 0What you need to know about Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) in Cochrane - 3 year(s) ago
By Ella Flemyng (Methods Implementation Manager) We are delighted to announce that the first Cochrane Review using Risk of Bias (RoB 2) as part of the formal pilot has published in the Cochrane Library.
Source: community.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
What you need to know about Risk of Bias 2 #RoB2 in Cochrane https://t.co/xxhWoxFV7I Very helpful community blog post from @EllaFlemyng of @cochranemthds
-
-
Mashup Score: 2Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease - Williams, CA - 2020 | Cochrane Library - 4 year(s) ago
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Collapse all Expand all Background Congenital heart disease (ConHD) affects approximately 1% of all live births. People with ConHD are living longer due to improved medical intervention and are at risk of developing non‐communicable diseases. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is reduced in people with ConHD, who deteriorate faster compared to…
Source: www.cochranelibrary.comCategories: General Medicine News, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
Physical activity interventions for people with congenital heart disease https://t.co/7cxxtjVQxF New @CochraneHeart systematic review includes 15 RCTs with 924 participants. #cardiology #ROB2 #CHD
-
-
Mashup Score: 4
These videos, originally part of the RoB 2: Learning Live webinar series, explain how to use the second domain of the RoB 2: bias due to deviations from the intended interventions. The presenters explain the difference between the effect of assignment to the intervention at baseline and the effect of adhering to the intervention as specified in the trial protocol, and also…
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet-
Interested in using #RoB2 to assess risk of bias in a systematic review? Check out these @cochranetrain videos and learn from the experts. https://t.co/lfGXPiPRqM
-
Kayleigh Kew, @cochranemthds, shares the findings from a study that measured time & effort review authors need to invest to use the revised risk of bias tool for RCTs #RoB2 compared with the existing study-based tool #RoB1, & how review quality. https://t.co/yw2KpRPkvA