• Mashup Score: 0

    It’s been a long time since we’ve seen the kind of strong national commitment that exists today to support medical research. Of course, this enthusiasm is more than justified because of the large number of unprecedented research opportunities that are at the ready to propel us toward defeating cancer and the numerous other diseases that […]

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Medical research funding: Why we must keep our foot on the accelerator [Jul 21, 2017] Michael Caligiuri @TheCancerLetter https://t.co/oKGYhprsQ3 #NCORP

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Richard L. Schilsky, MD, FACP, FASCO CONGRESS RECENTLY passed its fiscal year (FY) 2017 spending bill, which contains an additional $2 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This marks the first time in more than a dozen years that Congress funded back-to-back increases for the NIH, demonstrating the bipartisan consensus that’s been built around the need to support biomedical…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • MT @rsm2800 RE: @ASCOPost w/ @rschilsky -- Maintaining Predictable Increases in @NIH Funding for Cancer Research [Jul 25, 2017] https://t.co/nYtg448zmH NIH-funded studies dropped from 575 (2008) to 199 (2015) #ClinicalTrials #NCORP

  • Mashup Score: 5

    If you are unable to attend the SWOG Spring 2023 group meeting in person you may participate virtually.  Details for the virtual portions of the group meeting will be posted and updated as details are finalized.  Please check back often for updates. Questions? Contact meetings@swog.org. Return to SWOG Spring 2023 Group Meeting page To join…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Day 3 of @SWOG spring 2023 group mtg, incl a session on the #microbiome, a plenary on #globaloncology research, an #NCORP site PI mtg, mondo #cancer research cmte sessions, and a Bd of Govs session to select SWOG's next leadership! Join virtually: https://t.co/s2WGkUv1Jh https://t.co/0oaUKAc9lY

  • Mashup Score: 1
    Wolters Kluwer Health - 1 year(s) ago

    JavaScript Error JavaScript has been disabled on your browser. You must enable it to continue. Here’s how to enable JavaScript in the following browsers: Internet Explorer From the Tools menu, select Options Click the Content tab Select Enable JavaScript Firefox From the Tools…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • "Without clinical trials, cancer treatment would always remain the same" [Nov 3, 2012] - via @TomBeer in @OncologyTimes https://t.co/QKXVFmyVDG #ClinicalTrials #ctsm #NCORP

  • Mashup Score: 1

    Practicing and hospital-based community oncologists are increasingly recognized as sources for clinical research activity. Although surveys have documented patients’ and physicians’ willingness to consider participation in clinical research studies, accrual to clinical trials by adults in cancer res …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • 85% of cancer patients are treated in community setting [2003; Feb 23, 2009 online] @GaryCohenMD @CAonline https://t.co/3S36Xxakmp #ClinicalTrials #NCORP

  • Mashup Score: 1

    At the study institution, participation in clinical trials is reported to be low. The unavailability of appropriate clinical trials represents the most significant barrier. Continuing efforts to encourage physicians and to educate patients remain necessary. If the current study findings are found to …

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • #ClinicalTrials accrual among new cancer patients at a community-based cancer center [Jan 15, 2006] @RonaldGoMD et al. Cancer https://t.co/rIFeWGgufU #ctsm #NCORP

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Abstract. Purpose: The Institute of Medicine report on cooperative groups and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) report from the Operational Efficiency Working Group both recommend changes to the processes for opening a clinical trial. This article provides evidence for the need for such changes by completing the first comprehensive review of all the time and steps required to open a phase III…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Phase III Clinical Trial Development: A Process of Chutes and Ladders [Nov 9, 2010] Dilts, Cheng, Crites, Sandler & Doroshow @CCR_AACR https://t.co/lUxEPa4AqR #ClinicalTrials #ctsm #NCORP 769 steps, 36 approvals