-
Mashup Score: 19Involving People: A learning resource for systematic review authors - 6 month(s) ago
‘How to’ guide on engaging consumers & patients in systematic reviews
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiology News and JournTweet
-
Mashup Score: 15Cochrane Rapid Reviews: Learning Live webinar series - 6 month(s) ago
Welcome to this series of Cochrane Learning Live webinars, all dedicated to the topic of Rapid Reviews. These webinars are designed to provide you with a clear roadmap, helping you navigate the intricacies of rapid review methodologies. Whether you’re a researcher, a healthcare professional, or anyone who relies on evidence to make informed decisions, these webinars can be helpful for you. We are pleased to be joined throughout the series by leading experts in this field, and you can find out more about
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiology News and JournTweet
-
Mashup Score: 18Involving People: A learning resource for systematic review authors - 6 month(s) ago
‘How to’ guide on engaging consumers & patients in systematic reviews
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: General Medicine News, Cardiology News and JournTweet
-
Mashup Score: 7Learning events - 8 month(s) ago
Thursday 28 September 2023, 15:00 UTC *PPI Network webinar series* Research priority setting with patients and the public Beccy Maeso, Executive Lead, James Lind Alliance (JLA) Dr Zelalem Mengistu, Associate professor of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Urogynecology, University of Gondar, Ethiopia SIGN UP Tuesday 3 & Wednesday 4 October 2023 Changes to the review format with study centric data and a focused review article: What does it mean for authors? Ella Flemyng, Interim Head of Editorial Policy and
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 3Research priority setting with patients and the public - 9 month(s) ago
What tends to be researched has largely reflected the concerns of pharmaceutical organisations and individual researchers, rather than patients, carers and the public, or health professionals who have to address issues of uncertainty. This contributes to waste in research. Processes for identifying priority questions for research are an increasingly important feature and including patients, carers and the public is a growing movement. Patients and the public can be involved both in steering these
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 4Research priority setting with patients and the public - 9 month(s) ago
What tends to be researched has largely reflected the concerns of pharmaceutical organisations and individual researchers, rather than patients, carers and the public, or health professionals who have to address issues of uncertainty. This contributes to waste in research. Processes for identifying priority questions for research are an increasingly important feature and including patients, carers and the public is a growing movement. Patients and the public can be involved both in steering these
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 8Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy - 9 month(s) ago
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy is the official guide that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining systematic reviews of test accuracy for Cochrane. The Handbook has been produced by the Cochrane Screening and Diagnostic Test Methods Group. It is a guide for those conducting systematic reviews of test accuracy and a reference for more experienced authors. The Handbook will be updated regularly to reflect advances in systematic review methodology
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 6Publishing with Cochrane: author guidelines - 10 month(s) ago
This guidance is for authors preparing Cochrane Reviews intended for publication on the Cochrane Library. Cochrane Reviews provide trusted evidence for people making health and care decisions. Your research answers the questions that matter. We want to help you publish faster so that our readers can access relevant, impactful evidence. Follow the guidelines below to give your submission the best chance of being accepted for publication. Publishing a Cochrane Review is a team effort. Cochrane groups all
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 7Learning events - 10 month(s) ago
Tuesday, 1 August 2023, 13:00 UTC *PPI Network webinar series* SPFT Youth PPI Café: A framework for the meaningful involvement of young people in mental health research Abigail Thomson, PhD student & PPI consultant, Queen Mary University of London Julia Hickson, Youth PPI Coordinator Dr Sam Robertson, Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust SIGN UP Thursday, 3 August 2023, 09:00 UTC *Methods Support Unit web clinic* How can the framework for prospective, adaptive meta-analysis (FAME) be used to improve
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
-
Mashup Score: 2Cochrane International Mobility - 10 month(s) ago
Global exchange programme involving Cochrane groups around the world
Source: training.cochrane.orgCategories: Cardiology News and Journals, Latest HeadlinesTweet
An important principle of @CochraneLibrary reviews is co-production & stakeholder involvement. 📃 'Involving People' is a FREE @cochranetrain resource for systematic review authors & editors with best practice & practical suggestions ➡️https://t.co/SrnhHVJFnI @CochraneConsumr https://t.co/TgAW0PwWum