• Mashup Score: 96

    Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya joined the live Twitter Space where Florida governor Ron De Santis announced his 2024 presidential bid, asking him questions about plans to reform public health and federal agencies. Bhattacharya has previously praised DeSantis on how he had dealt with COVID-19 restrictions.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • RT @mlipsitch: https://t.co/vWgUIlUy6r. An "absolute honor" to work for a man whose political strategy is to use LGBTQ+ people, immigrant…

  • Mashup Score: 94

    Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya joined the live Twitter Space where Florida governor Ron De Santis announced his 2024 presidential bid, asking him questions about plans to reform public health and federal agencies. Bhattacharya has previously praised DeSantis on how he had dealt with COVID-19 restrictions.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • RT @mlipsitch: https://t.co/vWgUIlUy6r. An "absolute honor" to work for a man whose political strategy is to use LGBTQ+ people, immigrant…

  • Mashup Score: 84

    Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya joined the live Twitter Space where Florida governor Ron De Santis announced his 2024 presidential bid, asking him questions about plans to reform public health and federal agencies. Bhattacharya has previously praised DeSantis on how he had dealt with COVID-19 restrictions.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • RT @mlipsitch: https://t.co/vWgUIlUy6r. An "absolute honor" to work for a man whose political strategy is to use LGBTQ+ people, immigrant…

  • Mashup Score: 34

    Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya joined the live Twitter Space where Florida governor Ron De Santis announced his 2024 presidential bid, asking him questions about plans to reform public health and federal agencies. Bhattacharya has previously praised DeSantis on how he had dealt with COVID-19 restrictions.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • https://t.co/vWgUIlUy6r. An "absolute honor" to work for a man whose political strategy is to use LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and universities as punching bags to widen divisions and appeal to the worst in our country. Nice.

  • Mashup Score: 0

    In its inaugural article, the Editorial Board of Volume 263 urges Stanford to condemn its fraudulent alumni and initiate campus conversations around ethical abuses as they happen. “If Stanford refuses to acknowledge the wrongdoings of its recent graduates, the university is denying its role in shaping leaders who have harmed people’s lives and livelihoods,” the Board writes.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Tough and good piece from @stanforddaily. Institutional ambition is ICE COLD. Actually, more like 4K. The governing boards, boosters, etc. don't care about compassion. @tab_delete @jackstripling @arthomason https://t.co/fXHmwe7IfN

  • Mashup Score: 8

    His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • This reporting by @tab_delete, a @Stanford undergrad, is mindblowing; this is brave reporting about alleged research misconduct by Stanford President. Raises such imp questions. https://t.co/EUivKxXjab https://t.co/jcaD1GUjfj

  • Mashup Score: 0

    His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • I’m always impressed by student journalists, but this piece stands out as a tour de force investigative piece about Alzheimer’s, (alleged) scientific misconduct, peer review, and more. Worth a read - feels like a certain WSJ piece in 2015! https://t.co/gD3Hrzf0Nx

  • Mashup Score: 0

    His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Internal review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s Alzheimer’s research, colleagues allege https://t.co/Jrvr7bAyFz