• Mashup Score: 1

    In this era when technology dominates the field of radiation oncology, one would logically assume that improved technology can translate into improved treatment outcome. The artistry aspect of radiation contouring and planning—which is as important, if not more, than advanced technology—is frequently forgotten. Recent research and development in radiation oncology have focused exclusively on how…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • "In this era when technology dominates the field of radiation oncology...the artistry is frequently forgotten." Shiny tools/fancy tech do not compensate for sloppy target delineation, or guarantee better outcomes. Enjoyed this piece from Annie Chan. https://t.co/rXbdgquUK9

  • Mashup Score: 8

    I was recently informed that I won a contest that I did not actually enter. A Twitter poll was organized through @Radiation Nation inspired by Sue Yom, the new editor of the journal, asking, “What do people consider the gold standard for treatment planning for hypofractionated RT?” Response options were “HyTEC; AAPM TG-101; Timmerman Sheet; and NRG/RTOG protocols.” With just over 100 total votes…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Since we're on the topic of radiation dosing, this piece in @IJROBP by Timmerman on SAbR & constraints is a MUST read. Re: Timmerman constraints: "In all honesty, except for spinal cord, all other limits for the original table were my educated guesses." https://t.co/fJbJOrPpL4