• Mashup Score: 500

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • RT @DrJBhattacharya: Why did public health bureaucrats mischaracterize https://t.co/xFrJKpKNCp as a "let it rip" strategy? Though given res…

  • Mashup Score: 120

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Why did public health bureaucrats mischaracterize https://t.co/xFrJKpKNCp as a "let it rip" strategy? Though given responsibility to protect the old they lacked the creativity to do it without lockdown, which failed. Rather than admit inadequacy, it was easier to slander the GBD.

  • Mashup Score: 606

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Two years ago, today, I authored the Great Barrington Declaration together with @SunetraGupta and @DrJBhattacharya. Thank you, all 930,000 people who signed it, for joining us in urging for focused protection instead of lockdowns. https://t.co/q2spzScVnD

  • Mashup Score: 519

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Of everything I have written as a scientist, the least novel is the Great Barrington Declaration that argued for focused protection instead of lockdowns. It was simply based on basic long-standing principles of public health. https://t.co/07nispEacW

  • Mashup Score: 476

    As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Somebody can explain. In fact, more than 900,000 people can explain. In October 2020, it was explained in the Great Barrington Declaration, signed by 900K+ scientists, doctors and members of the public. https://t.co/q2spzScVnD @BelTel https://t.co/l1019PowfN

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Als Epidemiologen für Infektionskrankheiten und Wissenschaftler im Bereich des öffentlichen Gesundheitswesens haben wir ernste Bedenken hinsichtlich der schädlichen Auswirkungen der vorherrschenden COVID-19-Maßnahmen auf die physische und psychische Gesundheit und empfehlen einen Ansatz, den wir gezielten Schutz (Focused Protection) nennen.

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Herr @c_drosten bezeichnete die Great Barrington Erklärung als Sabotage. Jetzt behauptet er, dass @DrJBhattacharya ein Lügner ist, da Drosten die drei Autoren der Erklärung nicht explizit genannt hat. Interessante „Logik“. https://t.co/5cudd4fOOq https://t.co/Tw8moHjizg

  • Mashup Score: 1

    In qualità di epidemiologi delle malattie infettive e di scienziati della salute pubblica, siamo molto preoccupati per gli effetti dannosi sulla salute fisica e mentale causati dalle politiche adottate dai Governi in materia di COVID-19, e raccomandiamo un approccio che chiamiamo “Protezione Focalizzata” (Focused Protection).

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • RT @lorenzdonofrio: Dopo solo 2 anni e mezzo... Crisanti arriva alla Great Barrington Declaration https://t.co/4bv9wU9a53 @MartinKulldorff