• Mashup Score: 2

    This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search - by Irma Klerings, @micaelaescb et al. @CochraneRRMG @cochranecollab @CochraneLibrary #OpenAccess Link: https://t.co/wal20Qvglz https://t.co/t7HLoGzGNp

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Rapid reviews (RRs) are a helpful evidence synthesis tool to support urgent and emergent decision-making in healthcare. RRs involve abbreviating systematic review methods and are conducted in a condensed timeline to meet the decision-making needs of organisations or groups that commission them. Knowledge users (KUs) are those individuals, typically patient and public partners, healthcare…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users- by @cgarritty, @ATricco, @Maureenchats, @Daniellep89, @cmkamel, @drvalking @cochranecollab @CochraneRRMG #OpenAccess 📄 https://t.co/4wgeCEABuP https://t.co/i63UErQjL0

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Absent effective disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD), measures to prevent incident disease, delay symptom onset and prolong functional independence are paramount. Identifying effective preventive measures and care delivery models, in turn, requires improved information regarding modifiable risk factors and corresponding population-level interventions…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Promise and peril of claims-based dementia ascertainment in causal inference #EBMAnalysis by Natalia Festa, @LidiaMouraNVL @deborah_blacker et al. Link: https://t.co/aCLmGPNo0d Preview: https://t.co/8xHDCIiquj

  • Mashup Score: 3

    This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review (SR) methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods to ensure integrity. This paper addresses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment - by @CochraneAT et al. @CochraneLibrary @cochranecollab @CochraneRRMG #OpenAccess Link: https://t.co/BeHVQVPhnv https://t.co/RfeSjkDfNo

  • Mashup Score: 1

    This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search - by Irma Klerings, @micaelaescb et al. @CochraneRRMG @cochranecollab @CochraneLibrary #OpenAccess Link: https://t.co/wal20Qvglz https://t.co/XF0hm6coVn

  • Mashup Score: 7

    Rapid reviews (RRs) are a helpful evidence synthesis tool to support urgent and emergent decision-making in healthcare. RRs involve abbreviating systematic review methods and are conducted in a condensed timeline to meet the decision-making needs of organisations or groups that commission them. Knowledge users (KUs) are those individuals, typically patient and public partners, healthcare…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users- by @cgarritty, @ATricco, @Maureenchats, @Daniellep89, @cmkamel, @drvalking @cochranecollab @CochraneRRMG #OpenAccess 📄 https://t.co/4wgeCEABuP https://t.co/9NDbJGM85k

  • Mashup Score: 1

    This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. This paper addresses considerations for rating the certainty of evidence (COE) in RRs. We recommend the full implementation of GRADE…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence - by @ggartleh @drvalking @schunemann_mac @Elie__Akl et al. @CochraneRRMG @cochranecollab @CochraneLibrary @GRADE_WG #OpenAccess Link: https://t.co/K5YYtbE2Ti https://t.co/XsydsJbcdo

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Absent effective disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD), measures to prevent incident disease, delay symptom onset and prolong functional independence are paramount. Identifying effective preventive measures and care delivery models, in turn, requires improved information regarding modifiable risk factors and corresponding population-level interventions…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Promise and peril of claims-based dementia ascertainment in causal inference #EBMAnalysis by Natalia Festa, @LidiaMouraNVL @deborah_blacker et al. Link: https://t.co/aCLmGPNo0d Preview: https://t.co/91Owe6YUsf

  • Mashup Score: 1

    This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Rapid reviews (RR) use modified systematic review methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods. In this paper, we address considerations for RR searches. We cover the main areas relevant to the search process: preparation and…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search https://t.co/DsijF30kBM via @micaelaescb et al https://t.co/PGCPucIEX0

  • Mashup Score: 1

    In the last decades, researchers, governments and public campaigns have increased awareness about healthcare overuse.1 Low-value care is described as care unlikely to benefit the patient given the harms, costs or available alternatives.2 Clinical practice guidelines with ‘do-not-do’ recommendations and other de-implementation strategies were promoted to reduce it.1 One of these strategies is…

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • The paradox of using SDM for de-implementation of low-value care in the clinical encounter - #EBMOpinion by @paula_riganti @lvanbodegomvos @KirstenMcCaffer @karinkopitow Link: https://t.co/TJBytfxcDq https://t.co/eBiHZ9ruPO