Let’s hear scientists with different Covid-19 views, not attack them – STAT
Some scholars and academics wrongly ascribe scientists’ legitimate disagreements about Covid-19 to ignorance or questionable political or other motivations.
Some scholars and academics wrongly ascribe scientists’ legitimate disagreements about Covid-19 to ignorance or questionable political or other motivations.
Theo Baker, Hakim Jefferson, Peter Baker and the rules of replying to social media
The implications for the virus and the potential government response are vast and concerning
A new analysis of 99 million people shows the *bare minimum* increased risk of harms; For methodological reasons, the truth is likely worse; Low risk…
We cover all aspects of pharmaceutical drug development; early, late phase and FDA pivotal trials; Focus on oncology, but also cover important cardiology, neurology and…
The implications for the virus and the potential government response are vast and concerning
Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor Hematologist/ OncologistProfessor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and MedicineAuthor of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers,…
Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor Hematologist/ OncologistProfessor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and MedicineAuthor of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers,…
Two recent papers — by Fojo and Olivier — tell the full story
An analysis of contradictory past statements/ comments
Cancer Medicine is an open access, broad-scope oncology journal covering clinical cancer research, cancer biology, cancer prevention, & bioinformatics.