• Mashup Score: 31

    Ivermectin for COVID-19. Early treatment – 74% improvement, p < 0.0001. All studies - 70% improvement, p < 0.0001. 1 in 193 billion probability results of the 60 studies are from an ineffective treatment (p = 5.2e-12).

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Ha! I should have noticed this about the https://t.co/XQyVUjiSt9 people doing all those "real time meta-analyses" of #ivermectin, #HydroxyChloroquine, and whatever supplements they claim cure #COVID19. https://t.co/yKWzt5MZsV

  • Mashup Score: 120

    Ivermectin for COVID-19. Early treatment – 74% improvement, p < 0.0001. All studies - 70% improvement, p < 0.0001. 1 in 193 billion probability results of the 60 studies are from an ineffective treatment (p = 5.2e-12).

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • No. As @GidMK showed, https://t.co/XQyVUjiSt9 takes that list of studies and falsely and deceptively spins it into a body of data that strongly supports the efficacy and safety of #ivermectin for #COVID19 when the data do not support that. It's propaganda, lying with studies. https://t.co/CQSBx8P4md

  • Mashup Score: 33

    Ivermectin for COVID-19. Early treatment – 76% improvement, p < 0.0001. All studies - 71% improvement, p < 0.0001. 1 in 2 trillion probability results of the 60 studies are from an ineffective treatment (p = 4.5e-13).

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • From https://t.co/mxD5l2e13J a 1 in 2 trillion probability that the powerful role of Ivermectin in 60 human studies is not a real observation https://t.co/0KQHD5Qviv