Cardiac Failure With Robert J. Mentz, MD, and Anuradha Lala, MD

Cardiology

Drs. Robert J. Mentz, MD, and Anuradha Lala, MD, are world-renowned cardiologists and Co-Editors in Chief of JCF. Dr. Robert Mentz is an Associate Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Heart Failure Section at Duke University while Dr. Lala is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Zena & Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute and in the Department of Population Health Science and Statistics at Icahn School of Mount Sinai and Mount Sinai Hospital.


Interesting Studies You Might Have Missed at AHA 2024

Dear readers,

Now that we’re a couple of weeks out from AHA 2024, we thought it would be nice to highlight some of the other interesting studies that you may have missed.

Kindly,

Drs. Robert Mentz and Anu Lala


Articles
  • Mashup Score: 0

    Read the full article here

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Preliminary insights from the My Heart Your Heart trial showed that reconditioned pacemakers carried the same low infection risk as new devices when assessed out through 90 days. These early findings provide much needed data for those in lower-resource regions regarding the role for recycled devices.

  • Mashup Score: 0

    Read the full article here

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Prior studies show that patient outcomes in AF can be improved with AF ablation. However, the AF journey for many patients can involve recurrence and there is a need to better optimize ablation approaches. New data from the CRRF-PeAF and PROMPT-AF trials helps inform patient management involving AF ablation. 

  • Mashup Score: 0
    Ablation in VT - 8 day(s) ago

    Read the full article here

    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • The VANISH2 trial demonstrated that catheter ablation was more effective than anti-arrhythmic drugs (sotalol or amio) as a first line therapy in VT in the context of ischemic cardiomyopathy. 

  • Mashup Score: 0
    Tweet Tweets with this article
    • Open label study of 410 patients demonstrated that edoxaban was equally or more effective than warfarin at preventing stroke or systemic embolism at the expense of more major bleeding and GI bleeding. Follow-up studies with blinding are needed to better understand risk – benefit balance.